The Differentiation Study — Profile
A blind test of the Human Design Profile. You will see two short descriptions — one is your Profile's, one is not — with no labels. Pick the one that fits you better, then see how everyone has done so far. If Profile carries real signal, people should beat 50%. If they don't, that is a finding too. (Companion to the Type study; method and pre-registration on the validation record.)
Method & pre-registration
Hypothesis (pre-registered): participants will select the description matching their own Human Design Profile at a rate greater than chance (50%) in a blind, two-alternative forced choice.
Design: each participant sees their own Profile's experiential description and one randomly chosen other Profile's, unlabeled, in random order, and chooses which fits better (or "can't tell"). Descriptions omit profile numbers and line names to reduce label-matching. Familiarity is recorded so naive and expert responses can be separated. Some Profiles share a line, which makes them harder to tell apart — that is expected and part of what the test measures.
Data & privacy: only the Profile, the familiarity level, and the choice are stored — no names, no birth data, no accounts. Results are aggregate only, live, below. This is a self-selected online sample; the archive reports the numbers and draws no verdict.
Step 1 — About you
How familiar are you with Human Design?
Step 2 — Your Profile
Don't know your Profile? Calculate a free chart (for example at myBodyGraph or any free Human Design calculator) and read off your Profile (the two numbers, e.g. 1/3). Then select it:
Step 3 — Which fits you better?
Two descriptions, no labels. Choose the one that describes you more accurately.
Thank you
Your response was recorded anonymously. Here is how everyone has done so far:
Loading live results…