The Differentiation Study
A simple, open test of one Human Design claim: that your Type describes you. You will see two short descriptions — one is your Type's, one is not — with no labels. Pick the one that fits you better, then see how everyone has done so far. If Human Design carries real signal, people should beat 50%. If they don't, that is a finding too. (Method and pre-registration: the validation record.)
Method & pre-registration (read before or after)
Hypothesis (pre-registered): participants will select the description matching their own Human Design Type at a rate greater than chance (50%) in a blind, two-alternative forced choice.
Design: each participant is shown their own Type's experiential description and one randomly chosen other Type's description, unlabeled, in random order, and chooses which fits better (or "can't tell"). Descriptions omit Type names and in-group vocabulary to reduce label-matching. Participants report how familiar they are with Human Design, so naive and expert responses can be analyzed separately.
Data & privacy: only the Type, the familiarity level, and the choice are stored — no names, no birth data, no accounts. Results are reported in aggregate only, live, below. This is a self-selected online sample, not a random sample; it tests recognition within the interested population, and the archive reports the numbers without drawing a verdict.
Step 1 — About you
How familiar are you with Human Design?
Step 2 — Your Type
Don't know your Type? Calculate a free chart (for example at myBodyGraph or any free Human Design calculator) and read off your Type. Then select it:
Step 3 — Which fits you better?
Two descriptions, no labels. Choose the one that describes you more accurately.
Thank you
Your response was recorded anonymously. Here is how everyone has done so far:
Loading live results…