Appendix F

The Present-Day National Organizations and the Administrative Endpoint of the Erasure

The preceding sections document the erasure mechanism in the historical record. This section documents its result, as it stands in the public record at the time of writing: the roster of official national organizations the institution itself publishes. Read against the contractual history set out in Section A and the foundational history set out in Section D, the present-day roster is the erasure made administrative, the point at which the displacement of the original parties became the institution’s own published structure.

F.1. The Present-Day Roster

The International Human Design School and Jovian Archive each publish a list of the official national Human Design organizations. The two lists are materially identical. As of the time of writing they comprise organizations for the United States (Human Design America), the United Kingdom, Italy, Spain (Human Design Hispania), Japan, France, Brazil, China and Taiwan, Russia, the Dominican Republic, South Korea, Bulgaria, Portugal, and the Netherlands, together with Human Design Services for Germany and Switzerland.¹ The rights under which these organizations are licensed are held, per Jovian Archive’s own statement, by Jovian Archive Media Pte. Ltd., the Singapore entity that licenses the official publishing and teaching of Human Design worldwide.²

F.2. The Original Seven and the Present Roster

The original contractual federation, as established in Section A, comprised seven national licensees, issued by Jovian Archive Corporation beginning in September 2000: Germany, the United Kingdom, the United States, Italy, Spain, Japan, and Austria.³

Five of the seven original territories remain represented on the present roster, the United States, the United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, and Japan. The German territory is represented by a successor entity treated below. The seventh original territory, Austria, is not represented at all. There is no national organization for Austria on either the IHDS or the Jovian Archive roster; the German-speaking listing covers, in its own words, “Germany and Switzerland.”⁴

The absence is documentarily significant. Austria was not a peripheral seat. It held the September 2000 contract issued to Ilse Sendler and Human Design Austria, expanded in November 2003 to the exclusive German-language territory, a contract that, as established in Section A, the coalition’s lawyer-verified position held to remain active and legally valid.⁵ The contractually exclusive German-language licensee of record is absent from the institution’s published roster of licensees.

The disappearance is datable in the published record. Jovian Archive’s own directory of national organizations, preserved in the Internet Archive, listed “Human Design Austria” (www.humandesignsystem.info) as the official organization for “Austria & Germany” in September 2011.⁶ By May 2014 the same directory listed that organization for “Austria” alone, a separate entry, “Human Design Services” (www.humandesignservices.de), having taken the seat for “Germany and Switzerland.”⁷ In the capture of 13 April 2016 the Austrian entry is absent; the German-speaking seat is held solely by Human Design Services.⁸ The roster captured in September 2025 retains no Austrian organization.⁹ The domain by which Human Design Austria was listed, www.humandesignsystem.info, remains the contact domain published in the legal imprint of Human Design Worldwide (www.humandesignww.com), whose operator of record is Ilse Sendler, the contractually exclusive German-language licensee treated in Section A, now operating outside the institution’s roster.¹⁰

F.3. The German-Speaking Seat: Human Design Services

The organization now listed as official for Germany and Switzerland is Human Design Services, operated by Peter Schöber through Human Design Services GmbH in Münster.¹¹ Schöber records that he was appointed by the IHDS in 2013 as head of analyst and teacher training for Germany and Switzerland.¹²

This is the same Peter Schöber and the same HD Services treated in Section A. There, the coalition’s lawyer-verified statement of 2016 held that the establishment of any new Human Design school in the German-speaking territory under the purported authority of Jovian or the IHDS was contractually invalid, and named HD Services specifically.¹³ The present-day roster is the institutional realization of precisely that contested installation: the entity whose authority in the German-speaking territory was, on the documented legal position, contractually invalid is now the official national organization for that territory, while the licensee whose contract was held to remain valid is absent.

F.4. From Federation to Centralized License

Section A establishes, in Ra Uru Hu’s own words from May 2008, that through that year the IHDS “spent most of its existence as me,” and that the mutation into an organization beyond himself had not yet occurred.¹⁴ Section D establishes that the foundational assets and the European organizing network predated and stood outside any single corporation.¹⁵ The present-day structure is different in kind. The federation of independently contracted national schools has become a worldwide network licensed centrally by a single rights-holding corporation, Jovian Archive Media Pte. Ltd., incorporated in Singapore in November 2016: five years after Ra’s death.¹⁶

The institution presents this structure as continuous with the origin. The IHDS describes itself as founded in 1992 by Ra Uru Hu and as the official certifying agency and record keeper for Human Design worldwide; its national-organizations page carries the copyright line “Copyright 1992–2026.”¹⁷ The documented origin, as set out in Sections A and D, was neither a single school nor founded in 1992 as an institution: it was a federation formalized in 2000, atop an organizing network that held the foundational rights outside any corporation.

F.5. Application to the Section A.11 Pattern

The erasure mechanism set out in Section A.11 turns on the consolidation of origin and ownership into a single corporation, the displacement of original parties, and the maintenance of a narrative inconsistent with the documentary record. The present-day roster exhibits all three in administrative form.

Origin and ownership are consolidated in a single Singapore rights-holder licensing the entire network. An original party, the contractually exclusive German-language licensee, is absent from the published roster, and the territory is held by the entity whose authority there was, on the documented legal position, contractually invalid. And the institution’s account of itself as a single school founded in 1992 is maintained against a record, much of it the institution’s own, that documents a federated origin formalized in 2000 atop a pre-2000 network. The roster does not argue any of this. It records the outcome. The erasure documented in the preceding sections is, on the public roster, no longer an event. It is the structure.